Initial Fed Interest Rate Cuts: Mixed Returns 5 Months Out
Investing Environment Review and Outlook – Volume 29
We lowered the equity rating from overweight to our baseline neutral 3 rating. As of late July, the bull case for equities was strong, supporting our most bullish 5 rating. Goldilocks conditions – moderate growth with falling inflation meant no pressure on the Fed to tighten further, and in fact a cut was likely. Sentiment was mixed despite the new high in the S&P 500, another positive. The 18.5% rally in the first half was also bullish, with an average 10% return in the 2nd half in prior cases. We knew the third quarter was weak historically (-0.2% since 2000 vs. 4.3% in Q4) but the Q3 return was 11% annualized when volatility remained as low as it was. The Goldilocks scenario is still relevant, but the sharp drop in the 10-year yield combined with the increased volatility in stocks gives us more mixed signals for stocks, therefore a neutral 3 rating.
Initial Fed Interest Rate Cuts: Mixed Returns 5 Months Out
The Federal Reserve cut the Fed Funds target rate to 2.25% on 7/31, their first cut since they began hiking rates in 2015. There have been 18 prior initial Fed cuts since 1929. The last two (9/18/07 and 1/3/01) were followed by bear markets and recessions and other cases like 1929, 1932, 1937 and 1974 were also followed by sharp equity declines. The S&P 500 was up strongly after several others like 1998, 1989 and 1987. The results are volatile, with the next 7% move in stocks up just 50% of the time.
The level of rates may matter as well. Of the 6 prior cases when the target rate was below 5% after the first cut (vs. 2.25% today), 5 months later the average return was -10.2% and just 2 were higher. The 4 post WW II cases were better, with the market close to unchanged 5 months out, with 2 higher and 2 lower (chart 1).
The S&P 500 was down 5% the first week after just 3 prior initial cuts like this year; Nov 1929, July 1974 and Sep 1998. The S&P 500 was down over 20% within 3 months after the first two, although in 1998 the S&P 500 rebounded strongly after the second bottom, excessive pessimism, and 3 Fed cuts. Historically, S&P 500 returns following an initial rate CUT were lower 4-5 months out, then normal beyond that time.
10-Year Yield Decline
The China Trade War escalation on 8/1/19 (10% tariffs on another $300 billion of imports) might have been just politics and irrelevant to stocks, since as we have seen, the news can change in a day. However, since the news was followed by sharp declines in stocks, the 10-year yield and commodities like copper, the implications are more significant. For instance, the S&P 500 and 10-year have not declined this much together in a week (6% and 0.30%) since 2010-11, when the S&P declined 19%, a much bigger drop.
The sharp 10-year yield decline is generally bullish for stocks – taken alone the S&P 500 returned 17% annualized since 1990 when it was falling like this vs. 10% normally. However, the S&P500 returned -6.1% annualized in Q3 when the 10-year yield was falling, a big difference from the 66.6% annualized return in Q4. With the 10-year yield falling combined with higher volatility we have now, the S&P 500 returned just 5.2% (vs. 18.6% with the low volatility we had before last week).
Q3 Returns are Weak and Volatile
Third quarter returns are the lowest of any quarter at -0.2% since 1990 vs. 4.3% in Q4 (chart 2). For instance, 2015 was -6.9% and 2011 was -14.3%. However, 66% of prior Q3 returns were up and the median return at 2.4% is the 2nd best of the year. Much like initial Fed cuts, it just means the odds for stocks are more mixed, especially when volatility picks up as it has in early August (chart 3).
Prospects are still positive for stocks – goldilocks conditions are the most reliable for stocks, but the higher volatility combined with weak economic outlook signals this time of year are reasons to reduce our overweight position. A neutral exposure allows us the flexibility to add if indicators improve, or cut back further if conditions deteriorate.
End of Quantitative Tightening (QT): Positive
Aside from cutting the Fed Funds target on 7/31/19, the Federal Reserve also halted bond sales from their balance sheet, also known as quantitative tightening. This important move has mostly been ignored. This means the Federal Reserve will stop selling the bonds they purchased during quantitative easing (QE) to reduce their holdings as originally planned. In fact, they will buy bonds as current holdings mature. The important result is additional liquidity available for stocks.
Since it is the first case of QT, we cannot compare prior cases, but we can observe that the 3 cases of quantitative easing from 2009-2013 (the opposite of QT) were bullish for stocks, and somewhat negative when they ended (chart 4). Since January 2018, when QT started and liquidity was reduced for stocks, the S&P 500 failed to make a significant new high. From limited cases, it appears that the end of QT should be a net positive for stocks.
We are maintaining our neutral 3 rating for bonds and commodities. The gold rating remains a bullish 5 rating. We will continue monitoring our indicators and adjust our outlook as conditions change. Please contact me or your advisor with any questions.
This review and outlook report (this “Report”) is for informational, illustration and discussion purposes only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, financial, legal, tax or investment advice, of Brenton Point Wealth Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates (“Brenton Point”). This Report does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation, restrictions, particular needs or financial, legal or tax situation of any particular person and should not be viewed as addressing any recipient’s particular investment needs. Recipients should consider the information contained in this Report as only a single factor in making an investment decision and should not rely solely on investment recommendations contained herein, if any, as a substitution for the exercise of independent judgment of the merits and risks of investments.
This material is based upon information obtained from various sources that Brenton Point believes to be reliable, but Brenton Point makes no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of such information. Views expressed herein are current only as of the date indicated and are subject to change without notice.
This Report contains certain forward looking statements opinions, estimates, projections, assessments and other views (collectively “Statements”). These Statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward looking statements and projections. Brenton Point makes no representations as to the reasonableness of such assumptions or the likelihood that such assumptions will coincide with actual events and this information should not be relied upon for that purpose. Changes in such assumptions could produce materially different results. Past performance is not a guarantee or indication of future results, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance of any financial instrument mentioned in this Report.
Any benchmark shown herein is shown for illustrative purposes only. No index benchmark is available for direct investment. It may not be possible to replicate the returns of any index, as the index may not include any trading commissions and costs or fees, may assume the reinvestment of income, and may have investment objectives, use trading strategies, or have other materials characteristics, such as credit exposure or volatility, that do not make it suitable for a particular person. This is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security, investment, or other product and should not be construed as such. References to specific financial instruments and to certain indices are for illustrative purposes only and provided for the purpose of making general market data available as a point of reference only; they are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Investing in securities and other financial products entails certain risks, including the possible loss of the entire principal amount invested, as the value of investment can go down as well as up. You should obtain advice from your tax, financial, legal, and other advisors and only make investment decisions on the basis of your own objectives, experience, and resources.
Brenton Point accepts no liability for any loss (whether direct, indirect or consequential) occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material contained in or derived from this Report, except to the extent (but only to the extent) that such liability may not be waived, modified or limited under applicable law.
This Report may provide addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, Internet websites. Brenton Point has not reviewed the linked Internet website of any third party and takes no responsibility for the contents thereof. Each such address or hyperlink is provided solely for your convenience and information, and the content of linked third party websites is not in any way incorporated herein. Recipients who choose to access such third-party websites or follow such hyperlinks do so at their own risk.
All marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. This Report is licensed for non-commercial use only, and may not be reproduced, distributed, forwarded, posted, published, transmitted, uploaded or otherwise made available to others for commercial purposes, including to individuals within an institution, without written authorization from Brenton Point.
Source of data and performance statistics: Bloomberg L.P. and Factset Research Systems Inc.
©Brenton Point Wealth Advisors LLC 2019
Director of Market Research
Michael Schaus is the Director of Market Research for Brenton Point Wealth Advisors and Zweig-DiMenna. Since joining Zweig-DiMenna in 1992, his focus has been on macroeconomic research, the analysis of…READ MORE